A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electro-Magnetic Fields (ELF and RF). This means that maximum safe exposure limits set by national and international regulatory agencies should be set based on studies such as those included in this report, that indicate what levels of radiation cause harms to health, and that the safety standards should have a buffer margin below the levels shown to cause illness and disease.
A Selection of 67 Studies Arranged in Order of Radiation Level
Each chapter of the BioInitiative Report references many, if not hundreds of studies. The updated report added an additional 1800 studies. The chart below reflects a small selection of the referenced studies. The point is to show that serious health harms occur at radiation exposure levels far below current FCC maximum limits.
Cindy Sage ~ Editor of the BioInitiative Report Speaks Out
NOTE: The videos below were uploaded in December 2009, and there has been over a decade of scientific research completed since then.
Still, these are very informative on some of the basic research, and on the arguments about what the research means.
Cindy Sage ~ Intro to the BioInitiative Report ~ Part 1
Cindy Sage ~ Intro to the BioInitiative Report ~ Part 2
Samuel Milham ~ Electrification’s Tragic Legacy ~ Part 1
Data from death certificates and national census data analyzed in relation to timing of electrical wiring infrastructure being rolled in in cities versus rural areas, and in various states, shows that there were deaths from childhood leukemia and other illnesses directly attributable to electrical wiring, well before cell phones were developed.
Samuel Milham ~ Electrification’s Tragic Legacy ~ Part 2
Samuel Milham ~ Electrification’s Tragic Legacy ~ Part 3
Jerry Phillips ~ Electromagnetic Fields and DNA Damage ~ Part 1
Interpreting studies and dealing with criticism from industry and regulatory agencies. Refuting false arguments, and the value of supporting good studies on both sides.